There are two elements to server safety and privacy for a great VPN service:
The first is whether or not the VPN provider’s server network is safe and can’t be hacked into by criminals trying to sniff information and personal details or get info about the all round network configuration and principal server.
The second is the location of the servers. If all the servers AND the VPN provider’s location are in cooperative regions such as the United States and Europe, the safety is about as good as employing your nearby ISP. If none of the servers are in non cooperative or off shore places, then information retention laws apply to that VPN provider just as if they had been your ISP.
A current criminal investigation involving the encrypted email provider, Hushmail, which is primarily based in Canada, is a case in point. Unbeknown to one particular of its users, Hushmail (against its stated privacy policy) logged and cached information about the user for months and delivered that information and facts to government authorities in yet another country pursuant to court orders (this was a run of the mill criminal- not terrorism or human trafficking). Had Hushmail been situated in Panama or some other off shore place, it is significantly less likely that Hushmail would have acted on behalf of the police authorities.
If the VPN provider is physically positioned in a cooperative jurisdiction but has servers in non cooperative jurisdictions like Panama, Russia, China, then this is better privacy. But formel 1 live stream is if Both the physical location of the VPN provider and at least some of their servers are in non cooperative off shore places. Then information retention laws cannot be enforced and the VPN provider is far much less most likely to breach its stated privacy policy to log, cache and hand more than your information/information and facts/IPs.